DSpace Coleção:https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23862026-11-01T15:25:18Z2026-11-01T15:25:18ZDESAFIOS À IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DA LEI DA MEDIAÇÃO NOS CONFLITOS ADMINISTRATIVOSSOUSA, VITOR BONALD SANTOS DEhttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/395982026-10-22T06:14:05Z2025-10-02T00:00:00ZTítulo: DESAFIOS À IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DA LEI DA MEDIAÇÃO NOS CONFLITOS ADMINISTRATIVOS
Autor(es): SOUSA, VITOR BONALD SANTOS DE
Orientador: Freitas, Larissa Teixeira Menezes de
Abstract: This study examines the challenges to implementing mediation as an instrument for consensual dispute resolution within Brazil’s Public Administration, considering legislative developments and the consolidation of appropriate dispute resolution methods as a response to excessive judicialization, procedural delays, high costs, lack of transparency, and state inefficiency. The research is grounded in the finding that, although Law No. 13,140/2015, the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC, 2015), and Law No. 13,655/2018 have produced significant legislative advances, practical application remains constrained by cultural, legal, institutional, and training-related barriers. From this perspective, the study investigates how the adversarial tradition of Public Administration, the limited implementation of public policies for the training of public agents, and resistance from oversight bodies have hindered the effectiveness of mediation. Furthermore, it is evident that the so-called apagão das canetas —a paralysis of decision-making caused by managers’ fear of personal liability—constitutes one of the principal obstacles to innovation and the use of mediation, underscoring the need for an environment that harmonizes legal certainty with administrative efficiency. Therefore, although the integration between the Law of Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law (LINDB) and mediation practice represents a decisive step forward for Brazilian Administrative Law—providing greater predictability and confidence to managerial decisions and encouraging collaborative solutions—the analysis remains predominantly theoretical-normative. This highlights the need for future research involving empirical assessments across different institutions to evaluate the impact of mediation on reducing litigation and restoring relationships.
Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Tipo: TCC2025-10-02T00:00:00ZVIOLÊNCIA CONTRA A MULHER COM DEFICIÊNCIA NA PARAÍBA: A DUPLA VULNERABILIDADE E A PERSISTÊNCIA DE UMA IGUALDADE MERAMENTE FORMALPAULO, THALYTA CÂNDIDOhttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/395972026-10-22T06:13:58Z2025-10-09T00:00:00ZTítulo: VIOLÊNCIA CONTRA A MULHER COM DEFICIÊNCIA NA PARAÍBA: A DUPLA VULNERABILIDADE E A PERSISTÊNCIA DE UMA IGUALDADE MERAMENTE FORMAL
Autor(es): PAULO, THALYTA CÂNDIDO
Orientador: Abrantes, Giorggia Petrucce Lacerda e Silva
Abstract: O trabalho aborda o tema da violência contra a mulher com deficiência na Paraíba, bem como a persistência de uma igualdade meramente formal em relação a elas, uma vez que a dupla vulnerabilidade a que estão submetidas não é devidamente observada pelos mecanismos de enfrentamento à violência contra a mulher. Para a construção da pesquisa, foi adotada a metodologia exploratória e teórica, estruturada a partir da análise documental de legislações, jurisprudências, anuários estatísticos, plano de políticas públicas e dados oficiais da Paraíba, bem como da análise bibliográfica de literaturas já publicadas sobre o tema. Dessa forma, constata-se que as mulheres com deficiência na Paraíba, ainda são invisibilizadas, e que apesar de citadas em legislações e até no plano de políticas públicas, na prática, há uma grande lacuna entre o plano ideal (lei) e o plano real (a realidade vivida por essas mulheres). Assim, novas políticas públicas devem ser criadas e direcionadas especificamente para esse grupo, com a finalidade de suprir essa lacuna, e atender, de forma mais efetiva, as particularidades que envolvem a violência de gênero contra essas mulheres.
Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Tipo: TCC2025-10-09T00:00:00ZA MOEDA DE TROCA DA LIBERDADE VIGIADA: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura sobre a política criminal de monitoração por tornozeleiras eletrônicasALVES, RAYANNE RAQUEL FÉLIX DE ANDRADEhttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/395952026-10-22T06:13:55Z2025-09-11T00:00:00ZTítulo: A MOEDA DE TROCA DA LIBERDADE VIGIADA: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura sobre a política criminal de monitoração por tornozeleiras eletrônicas
Autor(es): ALVES, RAYANNE RAQUEL FÉLIX DE ANDRADE
Orientador: Silva Junior, Nelson Gomes de Sant’Ana e
Abstract: The theme of this monograph is contextualized in the implementation of electronic monitoring in Brazil, highlighting Law No. 12,258 of 2010, Law No. 12,403 of 2011, and pioneering experiences, such as the project “Liberdade vigiada, sociedade protegida” in the state of Paraíba, which defended the expansion of the use of ankle monitor as an alternative to imprisonment considering the collapse of the penitentiary system. Nevertheless, according to official data from the National Penitentiary Department Information System (SISDEPEN) regarding the Brazilian prison system, incarceration continues to grow exponentially, alongside the rising number of individuals under electronic monitoring in the country. In this regard, the general objective of this work was to critically analyze how the use of electronic ankle monitors in Brazilian criminal policy has been addressed in the national scientific literature between 2022 and 2024, adopting a systematic literature review method. At first, the relationship between criminal policy and electronic monitoring policy was discussed, considering the role of neoliberalism in criminalization processes. Subsequently, a search across ten specific databases, conducted under rigorous selection criteria, identified thirteen studies relevant to the proposed research. Thereafter, the main formal aspects of the selected materials were analyzed, followed by a thematic categorization of the collected corpus, analyzing it in light of the perspective of critical criminology and human rights. The analysis of formal aspects identifies gaps in scientific literature, including a predominance of theoretical studies, regional concentration of publications, and female underrepresentation, which limits the understanding of the concrete experiences of the monitored individuals. The critical analysis highlights that electronic monitoring operates as a bargaining chip for supervised freedom, shifting punishment into the social sphere under the guise of neutrality and modernization. The monograph contributes to the academic discourse by problematizing the supposed humanization of punishment, demonstrating that penal policy updates and reinforces punitive logic and structural selectivity, thereby highlighting the need for public policies genuinely committed to reforming the current situation.
Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Tipo: TCC2025-09-11T00:00:00ZA HERANÇA DO AFETO: A RECONFIGURAÇÃO DO DIREITO SUCESSÓRIO BRASILEIRO DIANTE DA MULTIPARENTALIDADESILVA, RAILMA SANTOShttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/395942026-10-22T06:13:53Z2025-09-15T00:00:00ZTítulo: A HERANÇA DO AFETO: A RECONFIGURAÇÃO DO DIREITO SUCESSÓRIO BRASILEIRO DIANTE DA MULTIPARENTALIDADE
Autor(es): SILVA, RAILMA SANTOS
Orientador: CUNHA, WLADIMIR ALCIBIADES MARINHO FALCAO
Abstract: This paper analyzes the impacts of the institute of multiparentality on Brazilian Succession Law, based on the premise that the evolution of the family concept, re-established under the principles of the 1988 Federal Constitution and the principle of affection, requires a reinterpretation of the classic structures of post-mortem asset transmission. The research addresses the transition from a patrimonial family model to a eudaimonistic and plural paradigm, which culminated in the jurisprudential consolidation of multiparental filiation by the Federal Supreme Court through General Repercussion Theme 622. The central problem investigates how the legal system reconciles the coexistence of multiple parental bonds with the order of hereditary succession to ensure filial isonomy and legal certainty. Through a bibliographic and documentary methodology, including an analysis of legal doctrine and jurisprudence, the study demonstrates that granting full succession rights to a multiparental individual is the logical and systemic consequence of the integral recognition of their filiation. It is concluded that the argument of "unjust enrichment" is unsustainable, as the plurality of inheritance rights corresponds to a symmetrical plurality of existential and material duties, thus affirming the coherence of the legal system in fully protecting new family arrangements and the fundamental right to identity.
Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Tipo: TCC2025-09-15T00:00:00Z