https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1099 2026-07-17T08:57:13Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38337 Título: Restrições à internacionalização de políticas públicas: uma análise indutiva da literatura Autor(es): Oliveira, Adriano Fernandes de Orientador: Superti, Eliane Abstract: The internationalization of public policies constitutes a central phenomenon in international cooperation processes, characterized by the pursuit of joint solutions to shared public problems across different national or subnational contexts. This article seeks to identify and systematize the main barriers that limit the internationalization of public policies, with an emphasis on the constraints that emerge inductively from the specialized literature. To this end, a Systematic Literature Review was conducted based on the PRISMA protocol, covering publications from 2010 to 2025 in the Scopus, SciELO, and Latindex databases. The final sample consisted of 73 studies, analyzed using Qualitative Content Analysis with support from NVivo software and mixed coding logic (deductive and inductive). The results confirm the presence of constraints traditionally highlighted in the literature, such as political, cultural, institutional, and technical factors, but also reveal four categories of barriers identified empirically: governance constraints, coercive barriers, standardization limitations, and international organizations as barriers. These categories indicate that limitations to internationalization stem not only from resource deficits or contextual incompatibilities, but also from governance dynamics, power relations, and diffusion strategies adopted within the international system. The results indicate that the effectiveness of the internationalization of public policies depends not only on the characteristics of the policies being transferred, but also on the institutional, political, and contextual conditions that shape their dissemination and adaptation. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC 2026-04-06T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38336 Título: A instrumentalização política do termo "terrorismo": uma análise crítica da rotulação do Hamas como grupo terrorista e suas implicações no conflito Israel-Palestina Autor(es): Ibiapino, Ana Sofya Spindola Orientador: Souza, Ielbo Marcus Lobo de Abstract: This study analyzes the classification of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) as a terrorist organization by Israel and its implications for the dynamics of the Israel-Palestine conflict. It is based on the hypothesis that such classification is not neutral, but associated with its political use in alignment with the interests of the State of Israel. The research adopts a qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive approach, based on primary sources, such as official documents, and secondary sources, including academic books and articles. Initially, the study examines the concept of terrorism, highlighting the absence of a universal and consensual definition, as well as its political and historical disputes. It then presents the historical context of the conflict, emphasizing the role of Zionism and external interventions. Subsequently, it analyzes the trajectory of Hamas between 1987 and 2023, highlighting its political and ideological transformations. The analysis is grounded in Critical Terrorism Studies (CTS), which understand terrorism as a social construct influenced by power relations. The study concludes that the classification of Hamas is not neutral and may function as a political instrument, simplifying the phenomenon and reinforcing dichotomous narratives within the conflict. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC 2026-03-31T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38335 Título: Tradição e ruptura na diplomacia nacional: o grau de mudança da política externa no governo Bolsonaro (2019-2022) Autor(es): Pontes, Beatriz Tunes Moreira Orientador: Ferreira, Tulio Sergio Henriques Abstract: This study analyzes the changes in Brazilian foreign policy during the administration of Jair Bolsonaro (2019–2022), aiming to assess whether this period represented a rupture in relation to the historical trajectory of the country's international conduct. The research is theoretically grounded in the framework developed by Charles Hermann, which classifies foreign policy changes into different levels, ranging from minor adjustments to major shifts in international orientation. Methodologically, this is a qualitative study based on bibliographic and documentary research, combining theoretical discussion with the reconstruction of Brazil’s diplomatic tradition and the empirical analysis of policy guidelines, official speeches, and diplomatic practices during the period. The study also engages with the literature on Brazilian foreign policy, highlighting debates on continuity and change. The findings suggest that, although significant shifts in discourse and some diplomatic practices occurred, there was no complete structural rupture. Instead, the period is better characterized as a reorientation of objectives with elements of discontinuity in relation to Brazil’s historical foreign policy tradition. The study concludes that the foreign policy of the period combined rhetorical rupture with institutional and structural constraints that limited the depth of change. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC 2026-04-01T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38334 Título: Pejotização e trabalho decente no Brasil: flexibilização neoliberal e a erosão das proteções trabalhistas Autor(es): Pinto, Victoria Rodrigues Orientador: Almeida, Lucas Milanez de Lima Abstract: This article analyzes “pejotization” as an expression of contemporary transformations in capitalism and its impacts on decent work in Brazil. Based on a critical approach grounded in labor sociology and International Political Economy, the study investigates how the flexibilization of labor relations, intensified after the 2017 labor reforms, contributes to the erosion of labor protections. The methodology is qualitative, with a descriptive and analytical approach, based on literature review and the analysis of institutional data from the International Labour Organization (ILO). The findings indicate that pejotization operates as a mechanism for transferring risks and costs to workers, undermining the four pillars of Decent Work: labor rights, social protection, quality employment, and social dialogue. Although often associated with autonomy and entrepreneurship, this practice tends to conceal subordinated labor relations and intensify precarization, including among highly skilled workers. The study concludes that pejotization is not merely a contractual innovation, but a productive reorganization strategy that challenges the foundations of labor protection and international commitments to the promotion of decent work, particularly within the framework of the 2030 Agenda. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC 2026-04-01T00:00:00Z