https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/2386 Tue, 11 Aug 2026 12:34:09 GMT 2026-08-11T12:34:09Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38626 Título: RECONHECIMENTO DE PESSOAS E PRESUNÇÃO DE INOCÊNCIA: OSCILAÇÃO JURISPRUDENCIAL EM TORNO DA INTERPRETAÇÃO DAS NORMAS PROCESSUAIS Autor(es): SOUZA, ENVER RODJA GONÇALVES DE Orientador: Meirelles, Lenilma Cristina Sena de Figueiredo Abstract: This final project analyzes the institution of personal identification as a means of evidence in Brazilian criminal proceedings, particularly in light of recent jurisprudential fluctuations surrounding the implications arising from its irregular application, contrary to the provisions of Article 226 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The research problem is connected to the recurrent use of personal identification as central evidence, albeit riddled with flaws that exacerbate judicial errors, abundantly documented in Brazilian case law, as well as violations of constitutional principles, such as the presumption of innocence. Given this issue, the study aims to answer the following questions: (i) has personal identification, as a means of evidence described in the Code of Criminal Procedure, been used as a suitable mechanism for achieving justice? (ii) is its application consistent with the Federal Constitution and legal guidelines? Using a theoretical-deductive approach and based on bibliographic sources and higher court judgments, the study highlights that many cases fail to comply with the legal requirements for producing evidence of identification of persons, a situation that compromises the validity of the evidence and the legitimacy of the criminal proceedings, leading to potentially unfair decisions. Respect for the procedural steps provides legal certainty, credibility, and social justice, making it necessary to interpret personal identification in light of constitutional precepts in favor of the accused in criminal proceedings. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38626 2025-10-09T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38625 Título: O PAPEL INDUTOR DA TRIBUTAÇÃO NO DESENVOLVIMENTO DE UM MERCADO DO HIDROGÊNIO VERDE NA MATRIZ ENERGÉTICA DO BRASIL Autor(es): MARACAJÁ, ANDRÉ RICARDO DE MENDONÇA Orientador: Carvalho, João Cláudio Carneiro de Abstract: This paper aims to observe the strategic role of taxation in promoting and integrating green hydrogen (H2V) into the Brazilian energy matrix, a topic of great relevance in light of the global climate crisis. Brazil, with its already predominantly renewable energy matrix, is in a privileged position to lead the production and export of H2V, which can strengthen its commitment to decarbonization and boost economic growth. However, the viability of H2V is hampered by high production costs. In this context, taxation emerges as a crucial tool, as it can act as an environmental policy instrument. The problem, therefore, is to understand how taxation mechanisms can play a significant role in the process of integrating green hydrogen into Brazil's energy matrix. To answer this question, the research started from the hypothesis that extra-fiscality can be used as a legal instrument to promote sustainability. Extra-fiscality, a function of taxation that goes beyond mere revenue collection, allows the state to encourage or discourage economic behaviors and activities, such as the production of clean or polluting energy. The research achieved its objectives, confirming that Environmental taxation has strong potential to promote energy transition. The analyses demonstrated that fiscal policy, through tools such as exemptions, rate reductions, and decreases in calculation bases, is essential to reduce the tax burden on H2V production. The study also analyzed the Legal Framework for Low Carbon Hydrogen (Law No. 14,948/2024), which established the Special Incentive Regime for H2V Production (Rehidro), and Law No. 14,990/2024, which created the Low Carbon Hydrogen Development Program (PHBC). These instruments grant benefits to mitigate initial costs, creating a favorable environment for investment and innovation in the sector. It was concluded that, despite legislative progress, detailed regulation of these incentives is crucial for legal certainty and the implementation of projects, positioning Brazil as a leader in the global energy transition. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38625 2026-09-26T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38624 Título: JUSTIÇA NEGOCIADA: ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DO ACORDO DE NÃO PERSECUÇÃO PENAL COMO MECANISMO DE DESPENALIZAÇÃO RESPONSÁVEL À LUZ DO ESTADO DE COISAS INCONSTITUCIONAL Autor(es): VASCONCELOS, ANDRÉ LUCAS CRUZ DE Orientador: Meirelles, Lenilma Cristina Sena de Figueiredo Abstract: This paper provides a critical analysis of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (Acordo de Não Persecução Penal – ANPP), introduced by Brazilian Law No. 13.964/2019, examining its actual criminal policy function within the context of the “Unconstitutional State of Affairs” of the prison system. The research is guided by the following problem: can the ANPP be considered a mechanism of “responsible depenalization” or does it merely reproduce the selective and managerial logic of its predecessor, the Special Criminal Courts (Juizados Especiais Criminais – JECRIM)? Based on a methodological approach of bibliographic and documental review, anchored in the framework of critical criminology and penal garantism, the study reconstructs the mass incarceration crisis and the legacy of the JECRIM. It concludes that the praxis of the ANPP, although applicable to certain white-collar crimes, is overwhelmingly focused on managing non-violent property and financial crimes, such as theft, fraud, and misappropriation. This widespread application reveals a dual selective function:on one hand, it optimizes control over the "retail criminality" that overcrowds the system; on the other, it offers an advantageous procedural outlet for economic offenses. Furthermore, the requirement of a formal confession as a condition for the agreement represents the point of greatest tension with the constitutional model, operating as a "bargaining chip" that undermines the principle presumption of innocence, an important element of the accusatory system. Thus, the ANPP proves to be less of a structural solution to the crisis and more of a sophisticated mechanism for managing the flow of the penal system. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38624 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38623 Título: A APLICACÃO DA LINDB PELO CONSELHO UNIVERSITARIO DA UFPB NA ATUACÃO COMO INSTANCIA JULGADORA EM RECURSOS ADMINISTRATIVOS Autor(es): SILVA, WILLIANS GON«ALVES Orientador: Mello Neto, Jose Baptista de Abstract: This study analyzed the application of the Law of Introduction to the Norms of Brazilian Law (LINDB) by the UFPB University Council (CONSUNI) in its role as a judging body for administrative appeals. The research was based on the premise that UFPB, as a federal public body, must follow the constitutional principles of public administration, such as legality, impersonality, morality, publicity, and efficiency. The LINDB, in turn, complements these principles, guiding the interpretation and application of norms to promote greater legal certainty and efficiency in management. The general objective was to analyze how the fundamentals of the LINDB are incorporated into CONSUNI's decisions, and the methodology used was qualitative research, with a case study from the analysis of administrative appeals decisions judged by CONSUNI. Five cases were examined, focusing on articles 4 to 6 and 20 to 30 of the LINDB. The analysis of the rapporteurs' opinions demonstrated that CONSUNI has consistently applied the LINDB in its decisions. In cases where appeals were denied, the reasoning showed alignment with Article 5 of the LINDB, prioritizing the common good and social purposes. The application of Article 6, which protects legal certainty, was evident in the defense of adherence to the public notice and the preservation of the stability of internal norms. The analysis also revealed the consideration of the practical consequences and real difficulties of management, in accordance with articles 20 and 22 of the LINDB, ensuring that decisions were pragmatic and efficient. In a case of filing due to loss of purpose, the decision demonstrated the application of articles 20 and 22, prioritizing efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The use of precedents from the STJ also demonstrated the application of analogy and general principles of law, in accordance with Article 4 of the LINDB. However, one of the analyzed cases could not be delved into due to the lack of a record of the reasons that led the collegiate body to reject the opinion, making it impossible to analyze the decision's fundamentals. In summary, CONSUNI, in its role as a reviewing body, has used the LINDB in a substantial way to support its decisions, strengthening university governance and the predictability of administrative acts. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/38623 2025-10-01T00:00:00Z