https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/2386 Sun, 05 Apr 2026 19:45:26 GMT 2026-04-05T19:45:26Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37894 Título: VIOLÊNCIA CONTRA A MULHER COM DEFICIÊNCIA NA PARAÍBA: A DUPLA VULNERABILIDADE E A PERSISTÊNCIA DE UMA IGUALDADE MERAMENTE FORMAL Autor(es): Paulo, Thalyta Orientador: Abrantes, Giorggia Abstract: Este estudio aborda la violencia contra las mujeres con discapacidad en Paraíba, así como la persistencia de una igualdad meramente formal respecto a ellas, dado que la doble vulnerabilidad a la que se ven sometidas no se aborda adecuadamente por los mecanismos de combate a la violencia contra la mujer. La investigación adoptó una metodología exploratoria y teórica, estructurada a partir de un análisis documental de legislación, jurisprudencia, anuarios estadísticos, plan de políticas públicas y datos oficiales de Paraíba, así como un análisis bibliográfico de la literatura previamente publicada sobre el tema. Por lo tanto, es evidente que las mujeres con discapacidad en Paraíba permanecen invisibles y que, a pesar de ser mencionadas en la legislación e incluso en el plan de políticas públicas, en la práctica existe una brecha significativa entre lo ideal (ley) y el plan real (la realidad vivida por estas mujeres). De esta manera, es necesario crear nuevas políticas públicas dirigidas en particular a este público, con el objetivo de satisfacer esta brecha y abordar de forma más eficaz las singularidades de la violencia de género contra estas mujeres. Palabras-clave: violencia; mujeres con discapacidad; doble vulnerabilidad. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37894 2025-10-09T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37746 Título: DESCUMPRIMENTO DE ORDEM JUDICIAL EM MANDADO DE SEGURANÇA: UMA INVESTIGAÇÃO JURÍDICA E SOCIAL Autor(es): GOMES, SASMIN MIRANDA SARMENTO Orientador: Mello Neto, José Baptista de Abstract: This final project analyzes the failure to comply with court orders in writs of mandamus, using as a case study the incident that occurred at the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), in which an injunction guaranteeing the right to Libras interpreters was granted, but subsequently ignored by the institution. The central objective was to investigate the extent to which a culture of impunity and the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms contribute to the failure to comply with court decisions. The research used the hypothetical-deductive method, based on the hypothesis that a culture of impunity and the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms contribute to the failure to comply with court decisions in writs of mandamus, combining documentary research, doctrinal analysis, and case studies. From this approach, it was found that failure to comply with court orders compromises not only the individual rights of the petitioner, but also the credibility of institutions and the effectiveness of the courts. Bobbio's reflection allowed us to understand the gap between proclaimed rights and their implementation, while Dimenstein contributed to the analysis of "paper citizenship" in the Brazilian context. The study also demonstrated that, although the legal system includes instruments of coercion—such as the crime of disobedience, astreintes (a law), administrative misconduct, and acts that undermine the dignity of justice—the practical application of these mechanisms is selective, targeting private individuals more severely than public officials. The conclusion is that overcoming this reality requires not only normative provision but also the firm and equitable application of existing sanctions, breaking with the culture of impunity and reaffirming the role of the Judiciary as guarantor of the Constitution and fundamental rights. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37746 2025-09-15T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37745 Título: DIVÓRCIO LIMINAR E EMANCIPAÇÃO FEMININA Autor(es): OLIVEIRA, LUIZA BRAGA DE Orientador: Lima, Raquel Moraes de Abstract: This undergraduate thesis analyzes the genesis and transformations of the institution of divorce in Brazil, with emphasis on the legal possibility of divorce. The historical approach highlights the strong influence of moral and religious values on family law, which prohibited divorce until the enactment of Law No. 6,515/1977. It also underscores the relevance of the Brazilian feminist movement—unique in its form of action—and the Married Women’s Statute of 1962 as key milestones for women’s emancipation and the transformation of their role within marriage and society. Furthermore, the study examines the normative changes introduced by Constitutional Amendment No. 66/2010, which consolidated divorce as a potestative right, eliminating both fault-based dissolution and minimum waiting periods. The research extends to the analysis of arguments for and against the granting of divorce as a preliminary injunction, weighing autonomy of will, human dignity, and the well-being of the parties against the procedural principles of due process and the right to adversarial proceedings. Methodologically, it adopts a qualitative, exploratory, and analytical approach, employing historical-comparative and deductive methods, supported by doctrinal sources, case law, and legislative analysis. The study concludes that the possibility of divorce as a preliminary measure remains subject to debate and exceptions; however, it often safeguards individual autonomy, particularly for women, in the context of deteriorated marital relationships. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Thu, 02 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37745 2025-10-02T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37744 Título: FRAUDE NO MERCADO DE CAPITAIS: ANÁLISE COMPARATIVA DA PROTEÇÃO AO INVESTIDOR À LUZ DO INSTITUTO DAS CLASS ACTIONS E DA TEORIA DE FRAUD ON THE MARKET Autor(es): SILVEIRA, LUCAS TOSCANO DE BRITO GOMES DA Orientador: Vilhena, Marília Marques Rêgo Abstract: This monograph investigates the ineffectiveness of the Brazilian legal system in providing remedies to investors who are victims of fraud in the capital markets, employing a comparative analysis with the American model. The study begins with the historical evolution of corporations, contextualizing their role in economic development, and examines Brazil's protective framework, which is centered on the Corporate Law and the regulatory actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM). It demonstrates that although the Public Civil Action (ACP) is the primary instrument for collective redress, its requirement for an individual liquidation and proof of causation by each victim creates a procedural bottleneck that effectively prevents financial compensation for the majority of investors. In contrast, the American system, through the synergy of class actions and the "fraud on the market" theory, establishes a presumption of reliance that facilitates mass litigation and effective damages recovery. The OGX and Americanas corporate scandals are analyzed as case studies that expose the failures of the national model, where administrative punishment occurs, but civil reparation remains theoretical. The paper concludes that enhancing investor protection in Brazil depends on adapting principles such as procedural aggregation and legal presumptions to create a more effective liability system and restore confidence in the market. Editor: Universidade Federal da Paraíba Tipo: TCC Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/37744 2025-10-06T00:00:00Z