Skip navigation

Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/2847
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorCosta, Alex Juvêncio-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T22:10:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-20-
dc.date.available2017-11-13T22:10:35Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/2847-
dc.description.abstractThe following of best practices of Software Engineering (SE) is something that provides many advantages for software companies. In this scenario SWEBOK is a guideline that supports these companies with information about the core of knowledge of SE, including a list of Best Practices (BP) to adopt. For small companies, however, some restrictions such as limited budget, short schedule, reduced number of employees, can hinder the advantages of the adoption of these practices. In this scenario, it is necessary to have useful information about which BPs have been adopted in small companies. Therefore, this paper describes the planning and execution of a quasi-systematic mapping study in order to report the adopting scenario of SWEBOK BPs in small companies during the last decade. It was possible to observe that the most prominent BP adopted is “Test application”, followed by the using of “Software Process Model” where the tests’ execution is already contemplated by. On the other hand, “Budget Limitation” and “Staff Size” were cited as motivations for avoid the adoption of BPs in small companies.pt_BR
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Ana Beatriz de Oliveira Silva (beatrizoliveira@cca.ufpb.br) on 2017-11-13T22:10:35Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) AJC20062016.pdf: 430584 bytes, checksum: af5cfa7bf7575ca01701a216dbe192cf (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-11-13T22:10:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) AJC20062016.pdf: 430584 bytes, checksum: af5cfa7bf7575ca01701a216dbe192cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-07en
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal da Paraíbapt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso abertopt_BR
dc.subjectSoftware engineeringpt_BR
dc.subjectSmall Companypt_BR
dc.subjectSoftware Qualitypt_BR
dc.titleA decade of best practices of software engineering in small companies: a quasi-systematic mappingpt_BR
dc.typeTCCpt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Aguiar, Yuska P. C.-
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Saraiva, Juliana A. G.-
dc.description.resumoThe following of best practices of Software Engineering (SE) is something that provides many advantages for software companies. In this scenario SWEBOK is a guideline that supports these companies with information about the core of knowledge of SE, including a list of Best Practices (BP) to adopt. For small companies, however, some restrictions such as limited budget, short schedule, reduced number of employees, can hinder the advantages of the adoption of these practices. In this scenario, it is necessary to have useful information about which BPs have been adopted in small companies. Therefore, this paper describes the planning and execution of a quasi-systematic mapping study in order to report the adopting scenario of SWEBOK BPs in small companies during the last decade. It was possible to observe that the most prominent BP adopted is “Test application”, followed by the using of “Software Process Model” where the tests’ execution is already contemplated by. On the other hand, “Budget Limitation” and “Staff Size” were cited as motivations for avoid the adoption of BPs in small companies.pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentCiências Exataspt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFPBpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAOpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:TCC - Ciência da Computação - CCAE

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
AJC20062016.pdf420,49 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons