A cooriginariedade entre autonomia pública e privada segundo Jurgen Habermas

Abstract

The present work aims to demonstrate how Jurgen Habermas will solve the problem of explicit public and private autonomy in the liberal and republican model of democracy. In this dissertation I used the bibliographic study method in the works of Jurgen Habermas and Habermas commentators. I used national and international works about the author. In the first chapter I describe the liberal and republican models according to the concept of Citizen, Law, State and Political Process. In the second chapter, I show that Habermas elaborates a third conception of deliberative democracy through a synthesis of the liberal and republican models. In this chapter, I also describe because Habermas criticizes the republican democratic reductionist model. In the third chapter, I return to the discussion of models of liberal and republican democracy, but from the perspective of the concept of autonomy. The respective concept is used by Kant and Rousseau to think about human rights and popular sovereignty present in models of liberal and republican democracy. However, Habermas claims that the concept of autonomy would only be explained from the explicit content of the co-originality between popular sovereignty and human rights. In the fourth chapter, I demonstrate how human rights and morals are separated and how Habermas unites them through a principle of discourse. After applying the principle of discourse as a union between human rights and moral, categories of essential rights emerge to reinterpret public and private autonomy and how these respective autonomies are solidarized.